申請(qǐng)英國(guó)博士可能被拒絕的幾個(gè)理由

申請(qǐng)英國(guó)博士可能被拒絕的幾個(gè)理由

可能理由：

Nature of the Problem (18.1%)

▲ It is doubtful that new or useful information will result from the project (14%)

【研究課題不新穎或者沒(méi)有用】

▲The basic hypothesis is unsound (3.5%)

【基本假設(shè)不成立】

▲The proposed research is scientifically premature due to the present inadequacy of supporting knowledge (0.6%)

【據(jù)現(xiàn)有知識(shí)，研究課題不成熟】

Approach to the Problem (38.9%)

▲ The research plan is nebulous, diffuse?and not presented in concrete detail (8.6%)

【研究計(jì)劃不清楚，沒(méi)重點(diǎn)】

▲ The planned research is not adequately controlled (3.7%)

【研究計(jì)劃不可控】

▲ Greater care in planning is needed (25.2%)

1. The research plan has not been carefully designed (11.8%)

【研究計(jì)劃設(shè)計(jì)得不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)】

2. The proposed methods will not yield accurate results (8.8%)

【研究方法不能得出準(zhǔn)確的結(jié)果】

3. The procedures to be used should be spelled out?in more detail (4.6%)

【程序步驟啥的不夠詳細(xì)】

▲ A more thorough statistical treatment is needed (0.7%)

【數(shù)據(jù)處理不夠周密】

▲The proposed tests require more individual subjects?than the number given (0.7%)

【試驗(yàn)的個(gè)體受試者沒(méi)有規(guī)定的多】

Competence of the Investigators (38.2%)

▲ The applicants need to acquire greater familiarity with the?pertinent literature (7.2%)

【申請(qǐng)人對(duì)相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)不夠了解】

▲ The problems to be investigated are more complex than the?applicants realize (10.5%)

【研究問(wèn)題比申請(qǐng)人意識(shí)到的要復(fù)雜得多】

▲ The applicants propose to enter an area of research for which?they are not adequately trained (12.8%)

【申請(qǐng)人打算進(jìn)入一個(gè)沒(méi)有任何經(jīng)驗(yàn)的研究領(lǐng)域】

▲ The principal investigator intends to give actual responsibility?for the direction of a complex project to an inexperienced?co-investigator (0.9%)

【主要研究者選了一個(gè)豬一樣的隊(duì)友】

▲The reviewers do not have sufficient confidence in the applicants?to approve the present application, largely based on the past?efforts of the applicants (6.8%)

【導(dǎo)師不信任申請(qǐng)人有這個(gè)能力】

Conditions of the Research Environment (4.8%)

▲ The investigators will be required to devote too much time to?teaching or other non-research duties (0.9%)

【研究者不能保證足夠的精力投入】

▲ Better liaison is needed with colleagues in collateral disciplines (0.4%)

【沒(méi)有相關(guān)學(xué)科同事之間的溝通交流】

▲ Requested expansion on continuation of a currently supported research project would result in failure to achieve the main goal of the work (3.5%)

【對(duì)現(xiàn)有研究計(jì)劃的展開(kāi)研究有可能會(huì)失敗】

以上是The National Institute of Health 根據(jù)700份Research Proposal得出的數(shù)據(jù)

還有這幾個(gè)小錯(cuò)誤，記得檢查規(guī)避一下。

▲ 18% forgot to number the pages【忘記編頁(yè)碼】

▲ 73% forgot to include a table of contents【忘記寫目錄】

▲ 81% had no abstract【沒(méi)有摘要】

▲ 20% failed to list the objectives of the project【沒(méi)有列出研究目標(biāo)】

以上是The Bureau of Occupational and Vocational Education comparable study根據(jù)353份Research Proposal得出的數(shù)據(jù)

好了，關(guān)于 research proposal 這件事兒就說(shuō)到這里啦。

以上就是關(guān)于【申請(qǐng)英國(guó)博士可能被拒絕的幾個(gè)理由】的解答，如需了解學(xué)校/賽事/課程動(dòng)態(tài)，可至翰林教育官網(wǎng)獲取更多信息。

往期文章閱讀推薦：

重磅！2027 CUG英國(guó)大學(xué)排名出爐！劍橋四連冠，IC重回前五...

劍橋大學(xué)最新錄取報(bào)告出爐！僅9.8%錄取率，中國(guó)學(xué)生如何突圍？