Externalities?occur when there is an external impact?on a third party?not involved in the economic transaction
These impacts can be?positive or negative?and are often referred to as?spillover effects
These impacts can be on the?production side?of the market (producer supply) or on the?consumption side?of the market (consumer demand)
External costs?occur when the?social costs?of an economic transaction are greater than the?private costs
A?private cost?for the producer is?what they actually pay?to produce a good/service
An?external cost (negative externality)?is the damage not factored in to the economic activity (for example, generating air pollution when producing electricity)
Private cost + external cost = social costs
External benefits?occur when the?social benefits?of an economic transaction are greater than the?private benefits
A?private benefit?for the consumer is?what they actually gain?from consuming a good/service
An?external benefit (positive externality)?is the benefit not factored in to the economic activity (for example, someone who studies law enjoys private benefits but society benefits from having strong legal institutions)
Private benefit + external benefit = social benefits
External Costs of Production
Negative externalities of production are often created during the production of a good/service
The market is failing due to?over-provision?of these goods/services as only the?private costs are considered?by the producers and not the?external costs
If the?external costs?were considered, the quantity of the goods/services provided?would decrease?and they would be sold at a higher price
Marginal analysis?in economics considers the?cost or benefit of the next unit produced or consumed
The?marginal private cost (MPC)?is the cost of?the next unit?produced or consumed
The?marginal private benefit (MPB)?is the benefit derived from the production or consumption of?the next unit
External costs of production (negative externality) result in an over-provision shown by the gap between Qopt?and Qe
Diagram Analysis
The?marginal social benefit (MSB)?is assumed to be equal to the?marginal private benefit (MPB)?as the focus is on the?producer side?of the market
The free-market equilibrium can be seen at PeQe. This is where the?MPC = MSB
The larger the?external costs?in production, the larger the gap between the?MPC?and the?marginal social cost (MSC)
The optimal allocation of resources from?society’s point of view, would generate an equilibrium where?MSB = MSC.?This can be found at?PoptQopt. There is?no market failure?at this equilibrium
The free market is failing due to?over-provision?of this good/service at?Qe
The factors of production used to manufacture this?over-provision?represent a?welfare loss to society?(pink triangle)
To be?socially efficient, fewer factors of production should be allocated to producing this good/service
There is an opportunity for?government intervention?(indirect taxes, legislation, regulation etc.), to force this market to be more?socially efficient
Any intervention that?reduces the welfare loss?will be beneficial
External Benefits of Consumption
Positive externalities of consumption?are created during the consumption of a good/service (merit goods)
The market is failing due to?under-consumption?of these goods/services as only the?private benefits?are considered by the consumers and not the external benefits
If the?external benefits?were considered, the quantity of the goods/services consumed?would increase?and they would be sold at a higher price
External benefits of consumption (positive externality) result in an under-consumption represented by the gap between Qe?and Qopt
Diagram Analysis
MSC?is assumed to be equal to the?MPC?as the?focus is on the consumer?side of the market
The free-market equilibrium can be seen at?PeQe. This is where the?MPB = MSC
The larger the external benefits in consumption?(positive externality), the larger the gap between the MPB and MSB
The?optimal allocation?of resources from society’s point of view would generate an equilibrium where?MSB = MSC.?This can be found at?PoptQopt.?There is no market failure here
The free market is failing due to an?under-consumption?of this good/service at Qe
More factors of production?should be allocated to producing the optimal quantity as?societal welfare will be gained?(pink triangle)
There is an opportunity for?government intervention?(subsidies, partial provision etc.) to force this market to be more?socially efficient
Any intervention that?gains welfare?will be beneficial
Exam Tip
Your understanding of externalities is frequently examined in MCQ.? You will be asked questions in language which can seem confusing, such as:
MSC is greater than MSB at free market equilibrium
The free-market quantity is less than the social optimum quantity
Increasing output will lead to a net welfare gain
It is intentionally confusing as there is only one right answer. Work through the options step by step and apply your theory and one option will stand out. That is the correct answer!
The Impact of Externalities & Government Intervention in Different Markets
Analysing?externalities?and the?government intervention?necessary to?correct them?is best done by considering?real world examples
Analysis should always include the?impact on stakeholders including producers, consumers, government, and relevant third parties
The Impact of Negative Externalities & Government Intervention
Example
External Costs
Possible Stakeholders
Government Intervention
Extraction of iron ore (mining)
Soil erosion
Loss of habitat for species
Decrease in air quality
Chemical leakage into the water table
Producers (Miners)
Manufacturers who purchase iron ore
Environment
Community who live nearby
Government
Special interest groups e.g. environmental pressure groups such as Greenpeace
Indirect taxation
Legislation & regulation, enforcement through fines
Any intervention has both advantages and disadvantages e.g. decreasing the external costs may decrease output which may decrease economic growth
The Impact of Positive Externalities & Government Intervention
Example
External Benefits
Possible Stakeholders
Government Intervention
Leisure Centres
Healthy people require less state medical care
Relieves stress & increases productivity in the workplace
Older people maintain independence for longer and less of a burden on family/state
Improves memory and concentration which raises productivity in the workplace
Improves relationships and helps others to be more productive
Leisure Centre Owners
Consumers (Members)
Community who live nearby
Government
Local health services
Employers
Economy
Increase provision
Subsidise existing provision
Advertise to raise awareness of benefits
Any intervention has both advantages and disadvantages e.g. subsidising Leisure Centre memberships may reduce funding available for libraries
轉載自savemyexams
以上就是關于【Edexcel A Level Economics A:復習筆記1.3.2 Externalities】的解答,如需了解學校/賽事/課程動態,可至翰林教育官網獲取更多信息。